The Origin, 2007

full of life. Now we are seeing the architecture

of the DEQUE series, which is more like

“bathroom sculpture” than a division of space

in the basic sense of the term. How do you

approach the individual designs? How do you

decide which direction to take?

We look at the new fittings and think about the

context in which they could be arranged.

Firstly, Sieger Design develops the shape of

the fitting. This also indirectly provides the

architectural language. The ritual bathroom is,

in principle, a kind of architectural amplifier,

which makes the formal message of the fittings

even clearer. If you compare, for example,

MEM and DEQUE, you see that the two series

have very different poetic qualities. MEM has

these wide spouts, similar to a waterfall. This

gives an extremely minimalist, exclusive

formal expression. There are two coordinated

surfaces as control elements etc. The water

emerges from this pure, spa­style arc. Very

archetypal. For me, this was the impetus in

order to harmonise the architecture with the

structure. I wanted to present the room as

something precious. That is why I started by

removing everything. There was no bathtub

as such, just a pool recessed into the floor.

We replaced the ceiling shower with a grid full

of holes. In addition to the pool, there was a

kind of wooden boardwalk and a few cushions

on the wall, deliberately inviting you to linger

a while. You dry yourself off, sit on a cushion

and enjoy the amazing view in this paradisical

garden. Everything was strongly influenced

by the idea of contemplation. A sensual

architecture, that was no longer simply con­

cerned with the purely functional, pragmatic

perception of the bathroom.

How does the DEQUE bathroom compare

with this?

DEQUE is a very radical concept from

Sieger Design. Radical in its proportions.

Particularly in comparison with MEM, which

is in fact somewhat delicate. DEQUE has a

concentrated power, extremely compressed.

A hard right angle, that floats completely flat

over the water. The interesting thing here was

that – with ELEMENTAL SPA, for example –

we had already progressed in respect of

architecture. You start off in the house and

pierce through the outer shell, penetrating

into the world. For DEQUE, I was looking at

landscape architectures. The Italian architect

Carlo Scarpa was a great inspiration. He is a

fascinating architect, who has worked a great

deal in Venice – the City of Water. We also

thought about how water is generally structured

in the urban context. Consider, for example,

the canals in Holland. At the end of the day,

we wanted to develop an architecture that

removes the concrete space. The idea was to

create a coherent water cycle that spoke an

architectural language, that I could just as

well imagine fitting in a loft apartment as in

an old Palazzo. So while we deliberately

defined the space for MEM – white walls,

sandstone floors etc. – for DEQUE we have

concentrated on the water cycle. In the sense

of a unit or even a sculpture.

And TARA LOGIC?

If MEM is a temple and DEQUE is land­

scaping, TARA LOGIC is the gym. Here it

is about the fact that we must perform not

183

only mentally but also physically. So we

have designed a bathroom in which you can

give an intensive workout to the body, mind

and soul.

Speaking of intensive, as part of the “Culture

Projects”, some time ago, alongside the com­

poser Carlo Peters, you initiated the “Noises

for Ritual Architecture” project. Sound col­

lages, for example, that can be downloaded

from iTunes. How important are the sound

elements in the context of your architectures?

182

The Landscape, 2011